Summary: ‘ Though the White House on Wednesday strongly urged lawmakers to defeat the reform amendment, Trump appeared to take a different kinds position in a tweet Thursday morning. Critics, including Sen. Those unmasking procedure changes were included in an initial version of the FISA reauthorization in December but were pulled as it appeared they would jeopardize the program when it was set to expire that month; Democrats had unanimously opposed the legislation when it was voted on by the committee. We need it!” With that being said, I’ve I personally directed the fix to the unmasking process since taking office, and today’s vote is about foreign surveillance of foreign bad guys on foreign land.
But the White House, in opposing those reforms, said the amendment would “re-establish the walls between intelligence, and law enforcement that our country knocked down at the end of the attacks of 9/11.” And last month, CIA Director Mike Pompeo, a foregoing congressman from Kansas, warned that allowing the program to lapse would get back the United States “to a pre-9/11 mindset in terms of just how we conduct our intelligence sharing.” “You’ll remember the deep criticisms the intelligence committee for not sharing for creating stovepipes and walls and barriers, it is variously described. “With that being said, I’ve I personally directed the fix to the unmasking process since taking office, and today’s vote is about foreign surveillance of foreign bad guys on foreign land. by Mike Memoli, Ken Dilanian, and Alex Moe WASHINGTON — Congress moved Thursday toward renewing a critical intelligence program despite a morning of confusion prompted by President Donald Trump’s tweets, in which he appeared to support significant changes that his administration had worked, for months to rebuff. The House vote came at the end of it’d rejected an amendment supported by a coalition of civil libertarians, and privacy advocates that would’ve placed new limits on the government’s ability to utilize communications involving American citizens.
“The way I understand the president’s position is that he wants some of the reforms, that he thinks that we should have a warrant to look at this, and that there’s a feasiblity that people with bias in the intelligence community could might possibly utilize that bias to in factabuse the system,” he said. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., echoed those sentiments, saying, “This issue is paramount in importance, difficult and complex and all of the president’s doing is confusing the American public, which is really unfortunate, for our national security.” They argue that government Why ought to be able to prosecute someone for tax evasion if incriminating emails happen to be swept up by the NSA, or the FBI….Read The Full Article Here
You Must Be Signed In To Rate News Items
Make Your Voice Heard, Give Us Your Rating
keywords: intelligence, house, sen, foreign, foreigners, trump